tailthemesdownload free
Skip to content

Journal

Keep the wordmark.

Marlow & Kite’s logotype was drawn by hand in 1984. Keeping it was the whole job; replacing it would have been the easy one.

Published
12 March 2026
Written by
Milo Vance
Filed under
Identity
Read
Six minutes

The bindery on Clerkenwell Road has been in one family since 1953 and in one typeface since 1984, when Priya Marlow’s grandfather paid a lettering artist forty pounds to draw the name on a trade card. It has been stamped into every cover the workshop has bound ever since. When the brief reached us it was about none of that: the trade counter shut at five, two thirds of the enquiries arrived after ten at night, and the website took payment by emailing an invoice the following morning.

The instinct is to redraw everything

A studio that is paid to make things has an obvious bias, and the honest version of it is this: a new mark is easier to present, easier to justify and much easier to charge for. It also lets us skip the part of the job where we have to work out what the old one was doing right. Nobody commissions a rebrand hoping the answer is that most of it should stay.

So we started by drawing the counter-argument. We set the 1984 logotype beside four replacements of our own and put all five in front of eleven customers who had spent more than £400 with the bindery in the previous year. Nobody chose ours. Two people described the original as “the one my ledger has on it”, which is not brand recall, it is ownership.

“A mark that has survived forty-one years has already won an argument we were not in the room for.”

What changed instead

We redrew the logotype rather than replacing it: the same letterforms, cut as outlines from a 600 dpi scan of a 1991 die stamp, with the spacing corrected and the ampersand rebuilt where three decades of photocopying had eaten it. Set at 14px on a phone it now holds together, which the traced version we were given never did.

Everything around it is new. A second type system carries the product copy so the logotype never has to do a job it was not drawn for. The packaging survives a courier rather than a counter. And the shop takes money at midnight, which is when the people who love this bindery are awake.

The number it moved

Of revenue online, from 12%
61%
Average order value
2.4×
Wordmark redrawn, not replaced
1984

None of that is an argument for keeping every old mark. Most of them are old rather than good, and the test is whether anyone outside the company would notice it going. Ask eleven customers. If they shrug, draw something better.

The case in full, with what we made

Shorter notes

At the length they deserved.

Eight or so a year, written when there is something to say and not before.

  • 14 January 2026

    Why the prices are on the site

    Every studio that hides its prices spends the first call finding out whether the other side can afford it. We would rather spend it on the work, so the ledger is public and the numbers are the ones we charge.

  • 3 December 2025

    We do not pitch for free

    Speculative work is paid for by every client who did not commission it. We will show you four cases, tell you what they cost and introduce you to the people who signed them off, and that is the whole pitch.

  • 6 November 2025

    The arch, in winter

    Railway arches are cold, loud twice an hour and the best studio any of us has worked in. The trains are on the ceiling, the presses are against the back wall, and the rent buys a room nobody has to book.

  • 2 October 2025

    Hiring without portfolios

    Two of the twelve arrived by writing us a note about a project of ours they thought was wrong. Portfolios show what a studio let someone ship; a paragraph shows how they think.

Older notes are in the studio’s own archive rather than on this page. Ask on the first call and we will send the file.

New business

Tell us what you're building.

Bring the messy version — the half-finished deck, the name you are not sure about, the site you have stopped showing people. We will tell you honestly whether we are the right studio for it, and who is if we are not.

Reply time
Within one working day
First call
30 minutes, no deck
Currently booking
From November, two slots